Value Stream
ScienceScience multiplied.
Who it is for, and why now

Scientists, researchers and the NGOs that need their data standardized. Starting with those whose funders require it.

Methods is built for the people who do the work: the principal investigator, the postdoc, the technician, the student, the desk-based analyst, anyone whose work runs through steps that live only in their own hands and who wants those steps standardized, automated where they can be, and shared with a team. Funders have made that urgent: open-science funders now require the protocols behind funded publications to be deposited openly, and federal data-sharing policy points grantees the same way. The first cohort is scientists and researchers whose funders require complete, shared protocols, and the NGOs that need their data standardized; then clinical doctors; then enterprise and university programs.

$35.3B
NIH extramural awards, FY2025
NIH, March 2026
5,471
Competing R01-equivalent awards, FY2025
NIH, March 2026
20,234
Postdocs in biological and biomedical sciences, 2024
NSF GSS 2024
$118K
Loaded cost of the computational hire a lab otherwise makes
BLS median $91,100 plus fringe

The alternative is a hire

Turning what a researcher knows into something a computer can run has meant hiring a computational person, paying a core facility by the hour, or losing a grant cycle to a failed reproduction. A researcher can budget Methods as a line item inside a modular grant and stay the knowledge authority.

The scientist stays the authority

A scientist with a discovery can build computational support into the budget far more cheaply than a hire, and does not hand the analysis to someone who does not know the science. Methods drafts; the scientist validates.

Where the incumbents stop

Notebooks and protocol repositories are storage: they wait to be filled in, and their newer AI features structure what a scientist already wrote. Nothing we have found interviews the scientist about what was never written down.

One standard across many labs

A company's research organization or a funder's network of labs can set a program standard, see a fit report for each lab and a divergence view across them, without any lab handing over data. See the program layer →

Same engine, second product

The guided-elicitation engine behind Methods was built to work anywhere expertise lives in one person's head. The second product on it, for owner-operated service businesses, is on the roadmap after the scientific cohort.